Hi Moxy!
Thanks for going through that for everyone else’s sake.
Like everyone else, I too was wondering “why this supplemental meeting?” I also wondered why I didn’t get tickets, until a few days ago. A brother I know who happens to be a president of one WTS corporation told me “I didn’t send you tickets because I knew you would have better things to do.”
It amazes me how closely the WTS follows the private sector corporate model in its approach to problems. In this case the GB has witnessed a dwindling of enthusiasm, so what did they do? They did the same thing so many corporate entities have--identify an existing source of enthusiasm and capitalize on it. The WTS knows there is unique interest in its Pennsylvania Corporation annual meeting each year. Usually this interest is more of the tempest in a teapot variety, but it is there. (Tempest in a teapot variety because: Rank and file JWs usually have little knowledge of or unique interest in this annual event. On the other hand, ranking members of the Bethel family and other Bethelites hold this meeting in higher esteem than normal conventions.)
In the private sector this sort of capitalization usually backfires unless a new and meaningful dynamic is added into the mix. People aren’t as stupid as we so often convince ourselves, and they react according unless they see some bona fide improvement--in this case improvement to stir enthusiasm.
In this case, it looks like the message taken home to congregation publishers is: “Hey, now we have an ADDITIONAL assembly to go to each year.” How many think the average publisher will get excited about THAT? No newly added and meaningful dynamic equals continued dwindling numbers, maybe even at a faster pace than would have been experienced otherwise.
Little wonder I was told “I knew you would have better things to do.” I did the yard--it looks FANTASTIC, btw. I can now declare that “I was saved!” :)
What burns me is how a few senior Bethel members were using words like “change” and “new” so much preceding this non-event event. Looking at the business model as a barometer, my guess is this will backfire. For sure next years “supplemental event” will not stir standing room only response.